Dear Prospective Reviewer:<\/p>\n
Given your expertise, we invite you to be a reviewer of articles submitted to the journal Strani jezici<\/em>. Your assistance in the review process will help us select quality articles for publication. Please accept our invitation if you have the time to provide a high-quality review and do not have any potential conflict of interest.<\/p>\n It is essential that you respond to our invitation promptly in order not to slow down the review process.<\/p>\n If you decide to decline our invitation, it would be helpful if you could provide suggestions for alternative reviewers.<\/p>\n If you accept, please first read the manuscript once all the way through and give yourself time to think about it from your own expert perspective.<\/p>\n We would like to remind you that, according to the COPE <\/em>Ethical guidelines for peer reviewers<\/em><\/strong><\/a>, the review process is strictly confidential. This means that, regardless of your decision, during and after the review process, you must not share information about the manuscript or other materials and data you receive without the consent of the Editor-in-Chief or authors.<\/p>\n Before you write the review, make sure you know what the focus of the journal Strani jezici<\/em> is, what kind of articles the journal publishes, and what specific reviewing criteria<\/em> you need to apply while reviewing the manuscript.<\/p>\n The following checkpoints should help you to write a review report that would help the Editor make a valid and objective decision on whether to accept or reject the manuscript.<\/p>\n When writing the review report, be aware of the following:<\/p>\n When reviewing the manuscript, you should carefully consider the following categories that Strani jezici<\/em> applies for (A) classification and (B) recommendations:<\/p>\n A) Categories<\/p>\n B) Recommendation categories<\/p>\n\n
\n
\n